文稿:傲雪
图片:nzherald
翻译:Darren
编辑: 佚夫
9月4日总理公布了关于9月3日奥克兰恐怖袭击的最新消息。
总理讲话全文如下:
“我想首先介绍一下昨天袭击中受害者的最新状况。我们现在知道总共有七人受伤。医院里有5人，其中3人情况危急。其余受害者已得到治疗，正在家中康复。 我知道我们都在继续想他们和他们经历的创伤经历。
我现在交给科斯特专员，介绍昨天事件的细节。你会记得，在昨天的记者招待会上，我说，我想分享所有的信息，我们所有的个人谁犯了攻击，只要我们能够。
通宵达旦，今天上午，《皇冠法》已经着手要求法院允许我们公布这一信息。这是成功的，但法院已给予个人家属24小时，以提出关于发布某些信息的任何关切。因此，虽然我可以提供有关个人犯罪史的细节，但有些问题与他的移民身份和新西兰移民局采取的行动有关，我还不能分享。我希望在接下来的24小时内分享剩下的信息。
我也无法分享他的名字，但我要指出，这不是我打算分享，无论法院的裁决。
任何恐怖分子，无论是活着的还是死去的，都不应因他们所寻求的耻辱而分享他们的名字。以下是我可以提供的详细信息。
实施昨天袭击的人于2011年10月抵达新西兰。 他22岁，持有学生签证旅行。不知道他当时对暴力和恐怖主义持极端看法。2016年，他在Facebook上对最近的恐怖袭击、与战争有关的暴力视频和鼓吹暴力极端主义的言论表示同情，引起了警方的注意。 警方曾两次与他交谈，一次是在2016年4月，一次是在5月。不过，网上活动仍在继续，2017年5月，他在奥克兰国际机场被捕。警方当时相信他正前往叙利亚。
搜查他的公寓后，他们发现了受限制的出版物和一把猎刀。他被指控拥有这些东西。 他最终承认了故意分发受限制出版物、欺诈和未能协助警方行使搜查权的指控。 他被保释。
2018年8月，在保释期间，该人购买了一把刀。 警方再次逮捕了他，但也发出了搜查令，发现令人反感或极端主义的材料。 他被控另外控罪包括拥有令人反感的材料、拥有攻击性武器及未能协助警方行使搜查权力。 他被拘留。
2018年9月，恐怖分子因第一组指控被判处12个月的监管。由于他在保释期间犯下的额外指控，他仍然被关在监狱里。
2018年9月，部长们指示官员就反恐立法开展进一步的政策工作。 整个2019年的工作进展。这包括将可能与恐怖主义意图或计划有关的筹备行为定为刑事犯罪的政策工作。
2020年7月，王国政府试图根据现行《制止恐怖主义法》对刀子和网上帖子提出追加指控，但未获成功，但被高等法院驳回。不过，最初非法持有这些物品的刑事指控仍然有效，因此在此期间，他被还押候审，等待判决。
您可能还知道，在此期间，他袭击了惩戒人员，并面临这些行为的指控。
与此同时，修改法律以增加预备性法案罪行的工作取得进展，2021年4月在议会提出了一项法案草案。它在五月进行了第一次阅读。
在此期间，官员们多次举行会议，考虑可以采取哪些途径来解决此人构成的风险，并为我们可能没有法律途径拘留他作好准备。
2021年5月，我听取了关于这项工作的简报。 我寻求进一步的意见，说明是否可以使用预防令，以及该个人是否经过心理评估。 后来有人告诉我，不能使用预防令，他拒绝心理评估。
目前，有关他的移民身份的工作也在进行中，但这是我希望明天能够分享的细节。
2021年5月，他在高等法院被判有罪，罪名是藏有令人反感的出版物，以及未能协助警方行使搜查权力。他被判犯有另一项拥有令人反感材料的指控和在公共场所持有刀子的指控。
7月6日，他被判处12个月有期徒刑，并具有特殊条件。这些条件包括，他必须居住在指定地址，只能拥有能够访问互联网的电子设备，而不是他的缓刑官批准的电子设备。应要求，他还被要求向缓刑官提供任何电子设备，以便检查或克隆该装置，并披露给他的缓刑官，并提供对所有社交媒体帐户的访问权限。他还被要求参加康复评估和治疗。
王国政府要求进行全球定位系统监测，但法院没有强制进行监测。在判刑时，此人还押监狱约三年。 他仍然被拘留，但鉴于继续拘留的所有法律途径已经用尽，官员们已为释放他做好了准备。
风险缓解工作已经开始。这包括警察加强监视范围，包括使用武装特别战术小组。这是昨天在现场的那个团体，他们射杀了恐怖分子。
警方还与新西兰SIS合作。 惩教署还建议他到新林恩服务中心报到，那里将有警察在场。在他获释之前，警方确定，他可能在没有违反其条件的逮捕令的情况下被逮捕，还有其他触发点将允许他被逮捕，包括实施或威胁实施暴力行为、获取武器或消耗令人反感的材料。
7月中旬，该人被释放到社区，并立即开始监视。7月下旬，我收到一份关于这个案子的书面更新。
8月9日，我会见了官员，并讨论了进一步的选择，以减少此人对社会构成的风险。
8月下旬，包括警察局长在内的官员提出了加快修订反恐立法的可能性。
在这些讨论的48小时内，司法部长与专责委员会主席进行了联系，目的是加快法律的修改。 那是昨天，袭击发生的同一天。
正如你所看到的，各机构利用他们现有的一切工具保护无辜的人免受此人的保护。
但是，我们有责任让其他人也看看这个案子的事实，分析他们，看看做了什么，还可以做更多的事情。IPCA 和验尸官将是这项工作的重要组成部分。
但我们也必须向前看，正如我们一贯所做的那样，我们必须愿意作出我们知道不一定改变历史，但可能改变未来的变革。
我们已经对正在制定的制止恐怖主义法进行了修改。由于部门报告刚刚报告给专责委员会。 这意味着公众有发言权，现在议会必须采取行动。
我承诺，一旦议会复会，我们将完成这项工作——这意味着要尽快通过这项法律，而且不迟于本月底。
我要感谢反对党领袖伸出援手，支持这一行动方针。
我在八月份又挑起了一件与这个案子有关的工作。不幸的是，它要求解除抑制令，因此我会提供更新时，发生这种情况。今天要结束，我有两个最后的事情要说。
首先是新西兰警方。不知疲倦，我有时被告知，你有多达30人参与监测这个人。 我想感谢你为这次活动所做的工作，以及你们为保护我们所有人的安全所做的一般工作。
我还要感谢那些在现场作出反应的人。谢谢。对奥克兰社区来说，时代是艰难的，我知道你会感觉到的。我们都与你同在。
我最后一次想到离开是来自阿尔努尔清真寺的伊玛目， 他比任何人都更了解恐怖主义的影响。他说，所有的恐怖分子都是一样的，不管他们的意识形态如何……他们代表仇恨，我们代表和平与爱。
我们有权确保个人的行为不会造成仇恨、判断和恶毒的打击。我知道新西兰你会很善良的， 请搂着我们所有的受害者，那些昨天，那些过去”。
The full text of the Prime Minister’s speech is as follows:
Prime Minister’s update on the 3 September Auckland terrorist attack
The full text of the Prime Minister’s speech is as follows:
I want to begin with an update on the status of our victims from yesterday’s attack.
We’re aware now that there were a total of seven people injured. There are five people in hospital, three are in a critical condition.
The remaining victims have been treated and are recovering at home. I know we are all continuing to think of them and the traumatic experience they’ve been through.
I’ll hand now to Commissioner Coster to give details of yesterday’s events.
You’ll recall that at the press conference yesterday I said I wanted to share all of the information we had on the individual who committed the attack, as soon as we were able to.
Overnight and this morning, work has been undertaken by Crown Law to have the courts allow us to release that information. That has been successful, however the Court has given the individual’s family 24 hours to raise any concerns regarding release of certain information.
So, while I can provide details concerning the individual’s criminal history, there are issues relating to his immigration status and action taken by Immigration New Zealand in particular, which I cannot share just yet. The remaining information I hope to share in the next 24 hours.
I am also unable to share his name, but I would note, this is not something I had any intention of sharing regardless of the court ruling.
No terrorist, whether alive or deceased, deserves their name to be shared for the infamy they were seeking.
Here are the details I can provide.
The individual who committed yesterday’s attack arrived in New Zealand in October 2011. He was 22 years old and travelling on a student visa. It was not known that he held extreme views about violence and terrorism at that time.
In 2016 he came to the attention of the police after he expressed sympathy on Facebook for recent terrorist attacks, violent war-related videos and comments advocating violent extremism. He was spoken to by the Police twice, once in April of 2016, and then again in May.
This activity online continued though and in May of 2017 he was arrested at Auckland International Airport. Police believed at that time he was heading to Syria.
A search of his apartment led them to discover restricted publications and a hunting knife. He was charged with possessing these things. He eventually pleaded guilty to charges of knowingly distributing restricted publications, fraud and failing to assist Police in the execution of their search powers. He was released on bail.
In August 2018, whilst on bail, the individual bought a knife. The police arrested him again but also issued a search warrant and found objectionable or extremist, material. He was charged with additional charges of possessing objectionable material, possession of an offensive weapon and failing to assist the Police in exercising search powers. He was kept in custody.
In September 2018, the terrorist was sentenced to 12 months supervision in relation to the first set of charges. He remained in prison due to the additional charges he committed while on bail.
In September of 2018, Ministers directed officials to undertake further policy work on counter terrorism legislation. Work progressed throughout 2019. This included policy work to criminalise preparatory acts which might be related to a terrorist intent or plan.
In July of 2020, the Crown made an unsuccessful attempt to lay an additional charge under the existing Terrorism Suppression Act for the knife and online posts, but this was rejected by the High Court. The original criminal charges of unlawfully possessing these items were still valid though, and so throughout this period he was remanded in custody, awaiting sentencing.
You may also be aware that during this time he assaulted corrections officers, and faced charges on these acts also.
In the meantime, work on changing the law to add an offence of committing a preparatory act progressed, and a draft bill was introduced in Parliament in April 2021. It had its first reading in May.
Throughout this period, officials met a number of times to consider what avenues could be pursued to address the risk posed by this individual, and to prepare for the potential that we may run out of legal avenues to detain him.
I was briefed on this work in May 2021. I sought further advice on whether prevention orders could be used, and whether the individual had been psychologically assessed. I was later advised that prevention orders could not be used, that he had refused psychological assessment.
At this time work around his immigration status was also underway, but this is detail I hope to be able to share tomorrow.
In May 2021, he was convicted in the High Court on the charges of possession of objectionable publications with knowledge and failing to assist the Police in exercising search powers. He was found not guilty of another charge of possessing objectionable material, and of the charge of possessing a knife in a public place.
On 6th July, he was sentenced to 12 months supervision with special conditions. These conditions included that he must reside at the named address, could only possess an electronic device capable of accessing the internet, other than that approved by his probation officer. He was also required, upon request, to make available any electronic device to the probation officer for the purpose of checking or cloning the device, and to disclose to his probation officer and provide access to all social media accounts. He was also required to attend rehabilitation assessment and treatment.
GPS monitoring was sought by the Crown, but this was not imposed by the courts.
At the time of sentencing, the individual had spent approximately three years in prison on remand. He remained in custody, but given all legal avenues to continue his detention had been exhausted, officials prepared for his release.
Risk mitigations were already underway. This included police standing up surveillance coverage, including the use of the armed Special Tactics Group. This is the group who were present yesterday at the scene, and shot the terrorist.
Police also worked alongside the NZSIS. Corrections also advised that he would be reporting to the New Lynn Service centre, where there would be a police presence.
Prior to his release, police identified that he could be arrested without a warrant for breach of his conditions, and that there were other trigger points which would allow him to be arrested, including committing, or threatening to commit a violent act, acquiring weapons or consuming objectionable material.
In mid-July, the individual was released into the community, and the surveillance began immediately.
In late July I was given a written update on the case.
On the 9th of August I met with officials and discussed further options to reduce the risk this person posed to the community.
In late August officials, including the Commissioner of Police, raised the possibility of expediting the amendments to the counter terrorism legislation.
Within 48 hours of these discussions, the Minister of Justice contacted the Chair of the Select Committee with the intention of speeding that law change up. That was yesterday, the same day the attack happened.
As you can see, agencies used every tool available to them to protect innocent people from this individual.
But we owe it to everyone to have other people look at the facts of this case too, to analyse them, to see what was done, and what more could have been done. The IPCA and the coroner will be an important part of this work.
But we must also look forward, and as we have always done, we must be willing to make the changes that we know may not necessarily have changed history, but could change the future.
We already have changes to the terrorism suppression laws under way. With the Departmental Report just being reported back to the Select Committee. That means the public have had their say, and now Parliament must act.
I am committing, that as soon as Parliament resumes we will complete that work – that means working to pass the law as soon as possible, and no later than by the end of this month.
I want to thank the Leader of the Opposition for reaching out to offer her support for this course of action.
There is one additional piece of work that I instigated in August which is relevant to this case. Unfortunately, it requires the suppression order to be lifted so I will provide an update when that occurs.
To finish today, I have two final things I want to say.
The first is to the New Zealand Police. You were tireless. I am told at times you had up to 30 people involved in monitoring this person. I wanted to acknowledge the work you did leading up to this event, and the work you do generally, to keep us all safe.
I also want to acknowledge those who responded at the scene. Thank you.
And to the Auckland community, times are tough, and I know you’ll be feeling it. We are all with you.
And the last thought I will leave is from the Imam of Al Noor mosque, who knows the impact of terrorism better than anyone. He said, “all terrorists are the same, regardless of their ideology…..they stand for hate, we stand for peace and love.”
We have it within our powers to ensure that the actions of an individual do not create a knock on of hate, judgment and vitriol.
I know New Zealand you will be kind, please wrap your arms around all of our victims.
Those of yesterday, and those of the past.
备注和负责声明
未经书面许可，保留所有权利，不得使用任何部分或完整的文章或照片。本号转载的文章都已注明出处，如对版权有任何疑问，请在第一时间发送邮件给本号， bbcc1223@126.com我们将在收到后第一时间进行删除。
若喜欢作品的可以点击“在看”，这样有机会分享给更多朋友。要是再点击“喜欢作品”，那将对我们鼓舞更大。
本号致力于好文推送，并对文中观点保持中立，所发内容仅供学习、交流。版权归原作者或机构所有，部分文章推送时未能查实原作者，在这里对你们表示深深的敬意。若涉及版权问题，麻烦请留言联系删除