文稿:傲雪
图片:网络
翻译:Darren
编辑:Tiffany
新西兰新闻秘书处9月4日消息,解除与奥克兰恐怖分子有关的最后镇压令表明,新西兰移民局多年来一直试图将他驱逐出境,并试图在考虑将他驱逐出境时拘留他,以便将他排除在社区外。
“此人于 2011 年 10 月抵达新西兰。他22岁,持有学生签证旅行”总理杰辛达·阿尔登说。
“抵达后不久,他提出了难民地位申请。新西兰移民部在2012年拒绝了这一要求,但他向移民和保护法庭提出上诉,并取得了成功。他于2013年12月获得难民身份。
2016年,恐怖分子引起了警方和新西兰国家警察局的注意。
在这些调查过程中,新西兰移民部获悉了导致他们相信该个人的难民身份是欺诈性获得的信息。这一进程开始取消他的难民身份,并因此取消他在新西兰居留的权利。
2019年2月,新西兰移民部取消了他的难民身份。他得到了递解出境责任通知。4月,他向移民和保护法庭提出上诉,反对将他驱逐出境。 他目前仍在监狱中,面临刑事指控。由于若干原因,递解出境上诉要到2021年5月刑事审判结束之后才能进行。
与此同时,各机构对此人给社区带来的风险表示关切。他们还知道他可能被释放出狱,他通过法庭的上诉可能需要一些时间。
新西兰移民局探讨了《移民法》是否允许他们在审理驱逐上诉时拘留此人。当法律意见回来说这不是一个选择时,这令人难以置信地失望和沮丧。
根据《移民法》,一个人只能被拘押,以便驱逐出境。新西兰移民部必须考虑是否可能进行递解出境。这意味着要评估法庭可能发现什么。新西兰移民部的皇家法律建议是,由于他旅行过的国家的状况,以及返回时可能受到的待遇,此人可能被视为受保护的人。受保护的人不能被驱逐出新西兰。新西兰移民局在收到这一建议后决定,在个人等待上诉期间,他们不能拘留他。 不久之后,他被释放出狱,警方开始监视和监视他 8月26日,移民和保护法庭的听证会改期。在恐怖主义袭击时,罪犯试图推翻驱逐决定的努力仍在进行中。 这是一个令人沮丧的过程。 自2018年以来,部长们一直在就我们驱逐此人的能力征求意见。 今年7月,我亲自会见了官员,并对法律可能允许有人以欺诈手段获得移民身份并威胁我们的国家安全的人留在这里表示关切。我要求开展工作,研究我们是否应该根据我们的国际义务修改我们的法律。
最终,这些时间表表明,新西兰移民局从一开始就试图驱逐此人,这样做是正确的”杰辛达·阿尔登说。
关于恐怖分子移民身份的详细时间表: 日期活动2011年7月14日 此人申请学生签证,以学习电子和电信文凭(7 级n).
2011年8月15日 根据当时的指示进行了国家安全检查,没有发现任何关切。新西兰SIS(国家安全委员会)依靠包括国际信息来源在内的一系列信息。2011年(或2014年)新西兰SIS没有资料显示此人已引起新西兰当局的注意。
由于对伊黎伊斯兰国的支持,此人于2016年首次成为新西兰SIS的调查对象。
2011年9月1日 学生签证的发放是个人符合所有相关的移民要求。
2011年10月21日 此人抵达新西兰。
2011年11月7日 该个人声称难民地位(基于卡鲁纳集团[1]的迫害)。
2011年11月23日 INZ通知他已退出文凭学习(因此不再符合学生签证的标准)。
2011年12月12日 以难民申请人为由给予首次工作签证。在确定他的申诉和移民及保护法庭的上诉时,他获得了随后的签证。
2012年4月19日 INZ拒绝了难民地位申请,因为它被发现缺乏可信度。
2012年4月27日 该个人向移民和保护法庭提出上诉,反对拒绝承认为难民的决定。
2013年12月20日 移民和保护法庭承认他是难民。
2014年1月22日 个人根据允许向被承认的难民提供居留权的特殊居住类别提出永久居民签证申请。
2014年2月7日 作为永久居民签证评估的一部分,收到了一份明确的新西兰警察证书。
2014年2月11日 根据当时的指示进行了另一次国家安全检查,没有发现任何关切。
2014年4月2日 永久居民签证是根据允许向被承认的难民提供居留权的特殊居留类别发放的。
2017年4月27日 INZ收到有关他希望加入恐怖组织的信息(警方正在与此人互动)。
2017年5月17日购买了前往马来西亚的机票(5月19日在机场被捕,之后他才可以离开)。
2017年8月4日INZ 的难民地位股根据收到的可能威胁到安全的信息,开始对个人的难民身份进行审查。
2018年4月24日 他要求取消他的永久居民签证,停止他的难民身份。他这样做的原因尚不清楚。
2018年5月16日总理询问个人难民身份和驱逐选择 2018年5月25日 一名难民和保护官员去探望他,但该人拒绝就该官员关于停止其难民地位的请求进行接触。
2018年6月1日向该个人发出以欺诈为由取消难民地位的通知 [2] 2019年2月1日 他的难民身份因欺诈而被取消。
2019年4月15日向此人送达了两份递解出境责任通知书。其中一人因犯罪罪在161号下服刑,另一人因取消其难民身份而根据第162号罪服刑,他确实提出上诉。
2019年4月30日该个人向移民和保护法庭提出上诉,反对其《递解出境责任通知》,理由是根据第162条取消其难民身份。在上诉确定之前,他不能被合法驱逐出境。
2021年5月7日 初步法律意见指出,INZ可以以恐怖分子应被驱逐出境和等待递解出境令送达为由,继续逮捕和拘留他。然后,INZ可向地区法院法官申请根据承诺令继续拘留他(等待递解出境)。还考虑证明他构成对安全的威胁或风险。
2021年5月至7月此人出庭受审,然后在奥克兰高等法院宣判。
2021年7月8日在考虑到当时的情况,包括关于其祖国的最新研究资料、最近高等法院刑事审判的结果、媒体对刑事审判和判刑的报道以及新西兰移民法和《皇冠法》提供的法律咨询之后,确定此人符合《移民法》规定的受保护人资格。 因此,他不太可能被驱逐出境[3]。
2021年7月8日随后,《皇冠法》规定,在下达驱逐令之前,INZ不能行使逮捕和拘留权,因为当这不是现实的前景时,不能以递解出境为目的拘留此人。 Ipt 听证会休会 – 未设置日期IPT听证会改在2021年9月13日举行,但鉴于法律代表权和COVID警戒级别情况的问题,8月26日,听证会进一步休庭,并规定了新的日期。
Government attempted to deport terrorist
The lifting of final suppression orders relating to the Auckland terrorist shows Immigration New Zealand had been attempting for years to deport him and also sought to detain him while deportation was considered in order to keep him out of the community.
“The individual arrived in New Zealand in October 2011. He was 22 years old and travelling on a student visa,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said.
“Shortly after arriving he made a claim for refugee status. Immigration New Zealand declined this claim in 2012, but he appealed to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal and was successful. He was granted refugee status in December 2013.
“In 2016 the terrorist came to the attention of the police and the NZSIS.
“In the course of these investigations, Immigration New Zealand were made aware of information that led them to believe the individual’s refugee status was fraudulently obtained. The process was started to cancel his refugee status, and with it, his right to stay in New Zealand.
“In February of 2019, Immigration New Zealand cancelled his refugee status. He was served with deportation liability notices. In April, he appealed against his deportation to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. He was still in prison at this time, and facing criminal charges. For a number of reasons, the deportation appeal could not proceed until after the conclusion of the criminal trial in May 2021.
“In the meantime, agencies were concerned about the risk this individual posed to the community. They also knew he may be released from prison, and that his appeal through the Tribunal, which was stopping his deportation, may take some time
“Immigration New Zealand explored whether the Immigration Act might allow them to detain the individual while his deportation appeal was heard.
“It was incredibly disappointing and frustrating when legal advice came back to say this wasn’t an option.
“A person can only be detained under the Immigration Act for the purpose of deportation. Immigration New Zealand was required to consider whether deportation was likely to proceed. That meant making an assessment of what the tribunal would likely find. Crown laws advice to immigration New Zealand was that the individual was likely to be considered a “protected person” because of the status of the country from which he had travelled, and likely treatment on return. Protected people cannot be deported from New Zealand. After receiving this advice Immigration New Zealand determined they could not detain the individual while he waited for his appeal.
“Soon after, he was released from prison, and police began their monitoring and surveillance of him
“On the 26th of August, the Immigration and Protection Tribunal hearing was rescheduled. At the time of the terrorist attack, the offenders attempt to overturn the deportation decision was still ongoing.
“This has been a frustrating process.
“Since 2018 Ministers have been seeking advice on our ability to deport this individual.
“In July this year I met with officials in person and expressed my concern that the law could allow someone to remain here who obtained their immigration status fraudulently and posed a threat to our national security. I asked for work to be undertaken to look at whether we should amend our law, in the context of our international obligations.
“Ultimately these timelines show that Immigration New Zealand from the beginning have sought to deport this individual, and were right to do so.” Jacinda Ardern said.
Detailed timeline regarding terrorist’s immigration status
Date
Activity
14 July 2011
The individual made an application for a Student visa to study a Diploma in Electronics & Telecommunications (Level 7 qualification).
15 August 2011
A National Security Check was undertaken as per instructions in place at the time and no concerns were identified. NZSIS (NSC) rely on a range of information holdings including international information sources. There was no information available to NZSIS in 2011 (or 2014) that the individual had come to the attention of authorities in New Zealand. The individual first became a subject of investigation for NZSIS in 2016 because of his support for ISIL.
1 September 2011
A student visa was granted as the individual met all relevant immigration requirements.
21 October 2011
The individual arrived in New Zealand.
7 November 2011
The individual claimed refugee status (on basis of being persecuted by the Karuna group[1]).
23 November 2011
INZ notified that he had withdrawn from his Diploma studies (therefore no longer met the criteria of his student visa).
12 December 2011
Granted first work visa on basis of being a refugee claimant. He was granted subsequent visas while his claim and Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal were being determined.
19 April 2012
INZ declined the refugee status claim as it was found to be lacking in credibility.
27 April 2012
The individual lodged an appeal with the Immigration and Protection Tribunal against the decision to refuse recognition as refugee.
20 December 2013
The Immigration and Protection Tribunal recognises him as a refugee.
22 January 2014
The individual made a permanent resident visa application under a special residence category that allows for the granting of residence to recognised refugees.
7 February 2014
A clear NZ Police Certificate was received as part of permanent resident visa assessment.
11 February 2014
Another National Security Check was undertaken as per instructions in place at the time and no concerns were identified.
2 April 2014
A Permanent resident visa was granted under a special residence category that allows for the granting of residence to recognised refugees.
27 April 2017
INZ receives information of his desire to join a terrorist organisation (Police are interacting with the individual).
17 May 2017
Purchased tickets to travel to Malaysia (was arrested at airport on 19 May before he could depart).
4 August 2017
The Refugee Status Unit in INZ began a review of the individual’s refugee status based on information received that he may be a threat to security
24 April 2018
He requests that his permanent resident visa is cancelled and his refugee status ceases. His reasons for doing so are unclear.
16 May 2018
Prime Minister makes inquiries about individuals refugee status and deportation options
25 May 2018
A Refugee and Protection Officer went to visit him, however the individual refused to engage on the officer’s request for cessation of his refugee status.
1 June 2018
The individual was served with notice of cancellation of refugee status on the basis of fraud [2]
1 February 2019
His refugee status cancelled on the basis of fraud.
15 April 2019
The individual was served with two Deportation Liability Notices. One was served under s161 in relation to his criminal offending and the other was served under s162 for the cancellation of his refugee status, which he did appeal.
30 April 2019
The individual lodged an appeal with the Immigration and Protection Tribunal against his Deportation Liability Notice based on the cancellation of his refugee status under s162. He could not be legally deported until his appeal was determined.
7 May 2021
Initial legal advice indicated INZ could pursue the arrest and detention of terrorist on the basis that he was liable for deportation and awaiting the service of a deportation order. INZ could then apply to a District Court Judge for his continued detention pursuant to a warrant of commitment (pending deportation). Consideration was also being given to certification that he constituted a threat or risk to security.
May – July 2021
The individual appears for trial and then sentencing in the High Court in Auckland.
8 July 2021
Following consideration of the circumstances as they stood at the time, including updated research information about his home country, the outcome of the recent High Court criminal trial, the media reporting on the criminal trial and sentencing, and legal advice provided by Immigration New Zealand legal and Crown Law, it was determined that the individual would qualify as a protected person under the Immigration Act. Accordingly, it was unlikely he could be deported[3].
8 July 2021
Subsequently, Crown Law provided advice that INZ could not exercise its powers of arrest and detention[4] pending the making of a deportation order, as the individual could not be detained for the purpose of deportation when that was not a realistic prospect.
IPT hearing adjourned – no date set
IPT hearing was rescheduled for 13 September 2021, however given issues with legal representation and the COVID alert level situation, on 26 August, the hearing was further adjourned with a new date to be set.
备注和负责声明
未经书面许可,保留所有权利,不得使用任何部分或完整的文章或照片。本号转载的文章都已注明出处,如对版权有任何疑问,请在第一时间发送邮件给本号, bbcc1223@126.com我们将在收到后第一时间进行删除。
若喜欢作品的可以点击“在看”,这样有机会分享给更多朋友。要是再点击“喜欢作品”,那将对我们鼓舞更大。
本号致力于好文推送,并对文中观点保持中立,所发内容仅供学习、交流。版权归原作者或机构所有,部分文章推送时未能查实原作者,在这里对你们表示深深的敬意。若涉及版权问题,麻烦请留言联系删除